Censorship and Internet Freedom with Alexander Ntoko

Alexander Ntoko, Chief of the Operations and Planning Department at the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), addresses the 2nd Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see below for full prepared remarks.

 

Full remarks

 

Alexander Ntoko: Good morning everybody. I am usually not used to reading declarations but I think it is important for us to put some of the discussion within the context of what is happening today and what also happened some decades back. Since the early 90s, the world has witnessed the explosive growth of the internet and associated IT services and applications. Today, the number of internet users amounts to some 1.8 billion according to I2 Data. The internet is a major medium for communication, a vital platform for many applications and services in informing society. Present in virtually every country on the planet and offering content in a host of different languages for different user groups, ethnicities and users. The internet is one of the most popular and democratic mediums of communication ever known. I use the word ‘democratic’ here not in the political sense but in its original sense, meaning rule of strength or by the common people. There are two words: ‘demos’ and ‘cracy’. One has to do with strength, one has to do with people. The Internet is about the strength of people. The internet reflects much, but not all, of modern society’s users. Originally to preserve defense, [inaudible], and scientists and telecommunication engineers, it is now the source of a whole range of services; content and information from a host of different users. 

A little bit of philosophical background. The internet reflects the best and the worst of human society. It can be used for great good, such as coordinating relief efforts, disaster remote sensing, [inaudible]. However, the internet can also for evil purposes, eager to disseminate child pornography, to trade illicit goods, spread false remarks. In a sense, it reflects much of our present society with both the best and the worst of human nature to be found online. This is where we sometimes enter into a difficult area, such as the behaviour we deem acceptable or cannot condone. This is something which is also culturally defined. Even though we are 1.8 billion people or so connected, we come from different cultures and different societies and have different values. 

Let me talk a little bit about regulation. The growth of the internet has been accompanied by growing arguments for and against establishing filtering, or censorship, or regulation, for the internet, as well as the internet content on services. It is traditionally said that the internet is the meeting point of two cultures of regulation: telecommunication networks, which have historically been highly regulated, and the internet, which has traditionally been more laissez-faire territory, originating as it did in a closed group of trusted users. Those of you who watch TV, listen to [the] radio, you know that they normally have some authorities that are responsible for regulating content [of] what you see on TV. In the broadcast industry, regulation, censorship, filtering has always been there. Historically, the broadcasting industry has been heavily regulated on many levels in many countries. From outright censorship of news during war time, to the exclusion of certain regional or street dialects on state television, to the protection of copyrights of music videos shown on TV. Today, content issues continue to dog the internet and it is increasingly difficult to talk about the internet without being drawn into the content issues, which have always been inherent in the broadcasting industry since its inception. Today, given technological conveyance, it is increasingly difficult to disentangle the pipes from the content which run [through] them. Social platforms offer a seamless experience in which it is impossible to dissociate the data and the content from the application and network. Many governments around the world are now moving to address problems in the publication and dissemination of materials over the internet, which are illegal under national laws and which may be considered harmful, or otherwise unsuitable, for users, particularly minors. Telecommunications regulators with a traditional mind to regulate telecommunication networks are increasingly being bombarded with complaints and concerns about the content running over these networks. We are seeing growing conveyance. Not only in the structure of regulators themselves, such as telecommunication regulators becoming communications commissions with broader minds, including broadcasting in some countries. But we are also seeing a broadening scope of applications and regulations. For example, consider the net-neutrality debate. Some of you might be familiar with this. Some operators are expressing their desire to be able to prioritize certain types of traffic according to their application or content running over their networks. Others argue that service offerings may be disadvantageous purely on the basis of communications and operator providers’ ability to pay. Beyond this [are] questions of network management, more profound questions of revenue sharing arise, and whether and how to enable network operators to gain [a] greater share of the revenues. In view of conveyance, a shape-up of the industry model, as well as the models for regulation, is on the way.

There are various degrees of intervention in terms of content, regulation or providing a framework of rules within which ICTV services are offered. We may distinguish monitoring, reviewing content, regardless of whether an intervention or cause of access to specific types of information is blocked or not. We may also look at filtering, which implies that some content may be blocked, and censorship, typically referring to the suppression, omission, and control of certain types of content for different reasons, based on different criteria, with a view of prioritizing specific applications. 

[The] reasons behind moderating or regulating content on the internet are diverse, but I can broadly talk about five main categories. [1] There are technology carriers for forging content. In light of my previous comments, some countries or operators have blocked access to certain technologies or applications on the basis that they are against the laws of the country. [2] We also have political regimes – which many of you might be aware –  [where] certain types of regulation appear to be prohibiting and/or restricting politically-sensitive content or material, which includes criticism of the government on the internet. So, some content would be censored because the government considers that [it] has to do with criticizing the government. [3] We have social, cultural, and religious reasons. Some filtering or censorship over the internet is based on reasons concerned with the protection or promotion of existing traditional, social, cultural, national religious values. [4] The fourth is [an] extension of existing domestic law. Before the internet, countries had laws. I don’t think there would be something like it after the internet but I still believe countries will continue to have national laws. The censorship on the illegal content on the internet may be viewed in some countries as an extension of offline censorship. Internet service providers in most countries may be required to block access to certain types of internet content outside the country, including material that is illegal [by] national law. [5] The fifth is for security reasons. More recently national security has proved one of the most commonly cited reasons for regulating content. Many governments have approved draft bills, allowing state control of the internet to improve national security. All the more so in the wake of recent concerns about terrorist activity, which have brought this issue to the front.

In summary, in debating regulatory approaches, filtering censorship on the internet, and  content in global context, we must take into account different elements of countries, national, cultural, socio-political, economic aspects, civil rights, including internationally agreed principles of human rights. During the two phases of the World Summit On The Information Society, which I2 played a lead role in organizing, world leaders and governments recognized that freedom of expression and the free flow of information, ideas and knowledge are essential for the information society, and reaffirmed their resolve to foster and respect cultural diversity and address the ethical dimensions of the information society. I2 have worked closely with civil society and UN agencies in addressing some of the issues related to how the internet works and also some of the concepts coming from its membership. Internet freedom and the filtering of content are all growing areas of interest for I2 member states. The boundaries between content, services, applications, and network infrastructure are becoming increasingly blurred. Let me conclude by quoting the I2 Secretary General in a recent interview on BBC News. He basically said the “right to communication cannot be ignored. We have entered the knowledge society and everyone must have access to participate.” This quote puts it within the context of what I just said and I thank you for listening.

Speakers and Participants

Related

Political Prisoners

Losing My Husband to China with Sophie Luo

Wife of imprisoned Chinese human rights lawyer, Sophie Luo, speaks at the 14th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. On the case of her husband, Ding Jiaxi: “I fell in love with Jiaxi the first time I met him. I’ll

Uyghur Persecution

Exposing China’s Lies with Rushan Abbas

Nobel-nominated Uyghur activist and sister to imprisoned Uyghur doctor Gulshan Abbas, Rushan Abbas, addresses the 14th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. On becoming an activist: “I am speaking today out of necessity. I’m a mother who had a fulfilling life

Political Prisoners

SOS Nicaragua with Berta Valle

Nicaraguan journalist and wife to imprisoned presidential candidate Félix Maradiaga, Berta Valle, addresses the 14th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. On Summit Alumnus Félix Maradiaga: “In 2019, my husband Félix Maradiaga stood here on this stage and said that he

Authoritarianism

Defying Totalitarian Regimes with Joo-Il Kim

Joo-Il Kim, North Korean defector and the founder of Free NK, a London-based online publication aiming to draw attention to the Kim-Jong Un regime’s abuses, addresses the 4th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see below for full prepared remarks.   Full remarks    

Arbitrary Executions

Duterte’s Drug War with Chito Gascon

Chito Gascon, Chair of the Human Rights Commission of the Philippines, addresses the 9th Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks.  On the fragility of human rights and democracy: “The Philippine case is a case of how quickly institutions such as rule of law, human rights,

Democracy

The Hong Kong Protests: An Eyewitness Account with Denise Ho

Denise Ho, award-winning Hong Kong-based singer, actress and pro-democracy and LGBTQ rights activist, addresses the 12th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy — see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. On her own involvement in the Hong Kong protests: “I started to understand the negative impacts of

The Struggle for Reform with Michel Tran Duc

Michel Tran Duc, Viet Tan activist, pro-democracy organizer, and the son of an exiled Vietnamese intellectual, addresses the 4th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see below for full prepared remarks.   Full remarks

Authoritarianism

Putin’s Propaganda with James Kirchick

James Kirchik, visiting fellow at the Center on the United States and Europe and the Project on International Order and Strategy at the Brookings Institution, addresses the 6th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see below for full prepared remarks.   Full Remarks   James Kirchik: I turned on the

Democracy

Nicaragua Cries Freedom with Felix Maradiaga

Felix Maradiaga, Nicaraguan opposition leader and human rights activist, addresses the 11th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full remarks in English and Spanish. On human rights abuses in Nicaragua: “It was the case of the child Conrado Alvaro, who was shot in

Abducted by China with Lam Wing-kee

Bookseller Lam Wing-kee, abducted by Chinese authorities for selling politically sensitive books in Hong Kong, addresses the 10th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. On Chinese persecution of Hong Kong booksellers: “From October to December 2015, shareholders and staff members

Political Prisoners

2021 Moral Courage Award with Daria Navalnaya

Daria Navalnaya, pro-democracy activist and daughter of poisoned and jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny – winner of the 2021 Moral Courage Award, addresses the 13th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. On father Alexei Navalny’s political activism: “He spent

Press Freedom

Press Freedom in Turkey with Orhan Kemal Cengiz

Orhan Kemal Cengiz, a Turkish human rights lawyer and journalist, addresses the 8th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy –  see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. On press freedom in Turkey: “Then they started to sue journalists who said that Erdogan is a dicator, or Erdogan

Democracy

Taking on the Cuban Regime with Laritza Diversent

Laritza Diversent, Cuban lawyer, journalist, and human rights defender who serves as Executive Director of the nonprofit Cubalex, addresses the 12th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy — see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. On lack of democracy in Cuba: “The judiciary does not exist.” “The

Welcome with Hillel Neuer

International lawyer, diplomat and Executive Director of UN Watch, Hillel Neuer delivers opening remarks at the 14th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. Introducing the Geneva Summit: “It is my honor to open the 2022 edition of our annual world assembly of human rights

Authoritarianism

Escaping North Korea with Yeon-Mi Park

Yeon-Mi Park, a North Korean defector and activist, addresses the 7th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see quotes below, followed by full prepared remarks. Quotes: To Be Confirmed Full Remarks To Be Confirmed 7th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy, UN Opening, February 23, 2015

Tortured by the Libyan Regime with Ashraf El Hajouj

Ashraf El Hajouj, a Palestinian-Bulgarian medic who was the principal defendant in Libya’s so-called “HIV Trial,” addresses the 1st Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see below for full prepared remarks.   Full remarks        

Authoritarianism and Dissent: 21st Century Horizons with Dong-hyuk Shin

Dong-hyuk Shin, advocate for human rights in North Korea and former prisoner at the notorious “Camp 14” North Korean labor camp, addresses the 5th Annual Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy – see below for full prepared remarks.   Full remarks   Dong-hyuk Shin: If they complain, they could be submitted to